• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki EMR "diabetes without complications" documented with codes listed under "with"

rsb2918@aol.com

Contributor
Messages
17
Location
Willow Grove, PA
Best answers
0
Advice needed. Many EMR systems allow the providers to "pick" their diagnoses from a drop down list. Most providers know that diabetes is coded as E11.9 and will automatically grab this diagnosis, no matter what the complications are (we all know they are not coders and do not recognize the importance of documenting certain diagnoses together) . My issue is, that it will also populate the code with "Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications". On a hand written chart, the provider will most likely document "diabetes" and the complications listed separately, where we can then assume the casual relationship between those listed under "with" in the index. My question is: Does the pre-populated statement of "without complications" negate the rule to casually assume a relationship between the other diagnoses in the record? My team has always made the casual relationship but have recently encountered a vendor who does not make this link. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
Top