• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki H & P billing

lmz0330

Networker
Messages
27
Location
Johnson City, NY
Best answers
0
My practice was "advised" years ago if a physician is doing an H & P for procedure and he is addressing issues above and beyond the H & P He must have a separate note. Do not use the same note for H & P and visit. Even if the above and beyond issue is addressed in the H & P. I believe it was a Blue auditor but can not be sure . Anyone else hear of this
 
My practice was "advised" years ago if a physician is doing an H & P for procedure and he is addressing issues above and beyond the H & P He must have a separate note. Do not use the same note for H & P and visit. Even if the above and beyond issue is addressed in the H & P. I believe it was a Blue auditor but can not be sure . Anyone else hear of this

It is correct that two separate notes would be needed. So there's documentation "A" for the H & P and documentation "B" for the unrelated problem(s). If documentation A is mixed with documentation B, there would be no way to level each portion. There would also be no way to tell what amount of work was spent for A and what work was spent for B. If the provider does work for documentation A, he/she can't also count that a second time for documentation B. By separating the notes, you have a clear distinction between the work for A and the work for B, thus you can level appropriately.
 
Top