-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Hammertoe repair and a flexor tenotomy
- Thread starter seslinger
- Start date
mbort
True Blue
did they really do it percutaneously? I would have to see the op note in order to determine if its incidental, more than likely it is though.
Here is the body of the op note " incision was made down to the level of the tendon. The tendon was trasected and reflected proximally and distally taking care to preserve all neurovascular structures. No other hemostasis was performed. A bone cutter was then used to resect the head of the proximal phalanx and rasp smooth with the bell rasp. Attention was then directed to the plantar aspect of the digit, which is still noted to be slightly contracted at this level due to a tight flexor tendon and flexor tenotomy percutaneously was performed at this time. A small section of the tendon was also transected for additional correction and shortening."
thank you.
thank you.
mbort
True Blue
I dont like this dictator!! lol
He/she only states "flexor tenotomy percutaneously was performed". He/she really needs to tell us how this was accomplished. Simply stating they did it, doesnt justify that it was done.
The codes 28010 and 28232 are so close with the exception of the word percutaneous.
What I would do is..query the doc. Make him give you more information. Because he also mentions transecting some of the tendon, I would lean more towards the open code...but he has that nasty perc word in there that throws us.
Once you gethim to document his incision, depth and how it was performed, you should be able to make an educated decision on whether or not the 59 wouldbe justified if you end up using 28010. 28232 does not bundle and would not require it.
Mary,CPC,COSC
He/she only states "flexor tenotomy percutaneously was performed". He/she really needs to tell us how this was accomplished. Simply stating they did it, doesnt justify that it was done.
The codes 28010 and 28232 are so close with the exception of the word percutaneous.
What I would do is..query the doc. Make him give you more information. Because he also mentions transecting some of the tendon, I would lean more towards the open code...but he has that nasty perc word in there that throws us.
Once you gethim to document his incision, depth and how it was performed, you should be able to make an educated decision on whether or not the 59 wouldbe justified if you end up using 28010. 28232 does not bundle and would not require it.
Mary,CPC,COSC