• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Here's a new one....

Create Wiki
Gemini18

Gemini18

Expert
Messages
324
Location
NYMAC, GMAC
Best answers
0
I know I've been asking about giving credit for ROS -- as many of you have, but I've never seen this statement before:

"Review of Systems: Negative x14 in all different systems"

There is no way I can give credit.
 
If that is all, then I would definitely not give it. Looks like a "blanket-statement". There should be a mention of positives and pertinent negatives. I don't see that in this line.
 
If there is nothing wrong why are they being seen?

I would not give credit for that. This would only even seem remotely reasonable if it was a well check and in that case there are no requirements on ROS.

Laura, CPC, CEMC
 
New one

Thanks Laura and Karoline -

I did not give credit for it. I've never seen that statement before and it does say anything to me. I can't guess at what systems were reviewed or anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top