Please bear with me as I try to word this.....i understand E/M codes to be a 'statutorily covered' service of Medicare. A diagnosis might make it non medically necesary. We should get an ABN stating Medicare might deny due to lack of necessity. If no ABN we should append modifier GZ.
Our offices are billing without any modifiers. Medicare denies and puts a PR (pat.responsible) reason on EOB. We bill medicaid for balance (state of VT and MAC is NGS).
"My" thinking is IF we used the mod GZ (no ABN on file) medicare would deny and we would do a CO instead.
Because we are not using modifiers is: 1) wrong (??) and 2) is skewing where liability lies. I am being told to bill Medicaid for balance. Im stuck in thinking 'but if we appended GZ, NGS probably would have denied to provider liable and we should not then bill Medicaid".
Am I thinking this correctly??
Apologies for the kryptic-ness in my typing....and thank you in advance for any comments.
Our offices are billing without any modifiers. Medicare denies and puts a PR (pat.responsible) reason on EOB. We bill medicaid for balance (state of VT and MAC is NGS).
"My" thinking is IF we used the mod GZ (no ABN on file) medicare would deny and we would do a CO instead.
Because we are not using modifiers is: 1) wrong (??) and 2) is skewing where liability lies. I am being told to bill Medicaid for balance. Im stuck in thinking 'but if we appended GZ, NGS probably would have denied to provider liable and we should not then bill Medicaid".
Am I thinking this correctly??
Apologies for the kryptic-ness in my typing....and thank you in advance for any comments.