Ros Noncontributory

Messages
359
Location
Malone
Best answers
0
If clinician writes, "ROS NONCONTRIBUTORY", when determining an EM for visit, what level of visit would that satisfy the documentation of ROS for? Problem focused, expanded problem focused, detailed or comprehensive?:confused:
 

amjordan

True Blue
Messages
751
Location
Kansas City, MO
Best answers
0
The E/M Guidelines state

"The patient's positive responses and pertinent negatives for the system
related to the problem should be documented."

The statement "ROS NONCONTRIBUTORY" does not fulfill the above requirements. Most auditors that I have poled on this issue will only count as 1 (problem pertinent) and some will allow none at all.
 

rthames052006

True Blue
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
1,905
Location
York, Pa
Best answers
0
If clinician writes, "ROS NONCONTRIBUTORY", when determining an EM for visit, what level of visit would that satisfy the documentation of ROS for? Problem focused, expanded problem focused, detailed or comprehensive?:confused:
Why would ROs be noncontributory, what was the pt being seen for, it almost seems impossible but I guess it could happen.

Roxanne Thames, CPC
 

goldejoa

Guest
Messages
28
Best answers
0
If the physician is reviewing all systems and they are negative, then more appropriate language would be " all systems reveiwed and negative" than noncontributory. Hope this helps
 

Lisa Bledsoe

True Blue
Messages
2,045
Location
Greeley, Colorado
Best answers
0
If are going to go with a blanket statement, it would be more appropriate to indicate one or two systems and then state "all other systems were reviewed and are negative". Stating "all systems reviewed and negative" doesn't really tell us how many systems were reviewed. Is it literally ALL systems, or does all mean all the systems that the provider reviewed? (could be that only 4 systems were reviewed and were negative).
 
Top