My understanding of critical care is that patients need to be critically ill and/or injured impairing one or more vital organ systems.
So, if a patient comes in with possible stroke symptoms with no apparent distress and the doctor is claiming critical care, it doesn't appear that way to me.
Patient's BP was slightly elevated but not critical, no respiratory distress
76yr old female who over the last 24hrs has what sounds like a recurrent TIA with right-sided paresis primarily involving the rt lower extremity. She has had perhaps as many as 3-4 episodes and as few as 2 over the last 24hrs. At present time she shows no motor weakness and is complaining of some numbness but has intact sensation. There is also a questionable history of seizure activity involving the lower extremity. Arrangements have been made for transfer this morning. While here the patient rec'd aspirin 81mg, Lipitor 80mg and IV normal saline at a keep open rate. We will allow permissive hypertension as long as her BP does not exceed systolic of 200.
What do you guys think?
So, if a patient comes in with possible stroke symptoms with no apparent distress and the doctor is claiming critical care, it doesn't appear that way to me.
Patient's BP was slightly elevated but not critical, no respiratory distress
76yr old female who over the last 24hrs has what sounds like a recurrent TIA with right-sided paresis primarily involving the rt lower extremity. She has had perhaps as many as 3-4 episodes and as few as 2 over the last 24hrs. At present time she shows no motor weakness and is complaining of some numbness but has intact sensation. There is also a questionable history of seizure activity involving the lower extremity. Arrangements have been made for transfer this morning. While here the patient rec'd aspirin 81mg, Lipitor 80mg and IV normal saline at a keep open rate. We will allow permissive hypertension as long as her BP does not exceed systolic of 200.
What do you guys think?