sa_hollingsworth
New
Debating the interpretation of the CMS telehealth video requirement to validate HCC conditions.
This (quote below), to my knowledge, has been interpreted as the video needing to be enabled for the entirety of the visit.
Thoughts? Do we have guidance or update anywhere that delineates between video use for partial vs full viisit? (i.e. if the visit is started as audio/visual, but the video drops, can that still be used to validate risk adjustment purposes?
RE: 'Diagnoses resulting from telehealth services can meet the risk adjustment face-to-face requirement when the services are provided using an interactive audio and video telecommunications system that permits real-time interactive communication.' [CMS: Applicability of diagnoses from telehealth services for risk adjustment ]
This (quote below), to my knowledge, has been interpreted as the video needing to be enabled for the entirety of the visit.
Thoughts? Do we have guidance or update anywhere that delineates between video use for partial vs full viisit? (i.e. if the visit is started as audio/visual, but the video drops, can that still be used to validate risk adjustment purposes?
RE: 'Diagnoses resulting from telehealth services can meet the risk adjustment face-to-face requirement when the services are provided using an interactive audio and video telecommunications system that permits real-time interactive communication.' [CMS: Applicability of diagnoses from telehealth services for risk adjustment ]