leahlhaynie
Networker
Some help would be greatly appreciated. I'm not sure what I could bill here. The access?
"Patient was brought back to the EP lab and after informed consent was verified patient was placed under anesthesia.
After venous access was obtained a sheath was placed and a Blazer ablation catheter was positioned in the RA.
The RV lead was passive and noted to be having high thresholds at 3.0mV.
At this point patient also only 14% in Afib RVR (as opposed to >70% at the time of implant of pacemaker in Dec 2014).
We then decided to abort the procedure, since she needs dual PPM upgrade and AV nodal ablation."
Thank you!
"Patient was brought back to the EP lab and after informed consent was verified patient was placed under anesthesia.
After venous access was obtained a sheath was placed and a Blazer ablation catheter was positioned in the RA.
The RV lead was passive and noted to be having high thresholds at 3.0mV.
At this point patient also only 14% in Afib RVR (as opposed to >70% at the time of implant of pacemaker in Dec 2014).
We then decided to abort the procedure, since she needs dual PPM upgrade and AV nodal ablation."
Thank you!